2165
- with increments
On the whole 9 Think it
before.
may
legitimality be argued that to give
a
larger louse allce to married wen
does not go against the principle of
not differentiating between married and
conmarried
the
exolamento being
in
cathe
Cist
A
fixed salary
the equivalent of quarters, which
normally cost the married man
Hone
This should
coon
ast a
excessive if
of living has
Lista
650
35%.
? Wel
to
to
for. that we
and
prefarsch
afprove of
af
A if he
HB
his processing
Leen
L
27/7/16
objon
A
In view
1 Rough her
way
be cases where the
f
the desp. on
43175/15-
I
unwarried have defendents and need-
1
J
A
inconvencent
just ar
musty
|
Bur
Buck
differentiation might
Le
¡
extra expense
out
B
and
very
at in spite of
off any
the best
way
grant
a
seems to be
leat all es
B745
per month to all married officers
antitled to pree quarters and liomp
ри
in reatest quarters_ from
quarters from 1 Jan 1817
(not 1916
3)
1986 as in faca 3.
hesitate to approve this proposal: but-
the circumstances of
to call for some relief,
Kovs
these men seem
I should
propose that the proposal be given
that
temporary approval, on the understanding
as possible free quarters will be provided for the officers
as
LA -
amed.
Yes, as at
Hol at by
28
7.46
( It seems clear that if
these men are entitled to free quarters and are not
provided with free quarters they should temporarily
have an allowance
roughly reasonably equivalent to what
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.